As with any gear, there are pros and cons in the AMA's design, but I believe it is a very effective re-creator of the classic Leslie growl, and while the price is higher than most alternatives, the results are stellar. The AMA is a good choice for keyboard players who want to have the classic Leslie overdrive sound at variable volume levels for different applications.
Compared to a tube preamp alone, the AMA sounds more realistic: &less "fizzy" when distorting, with a more even timbre over small volume changes. Its controls are well tailored to the needs of the organist.
![]() |
The AMA is a 2U-rack product housed in a very durable, vintage-looking metal cabinet. Like its preamp brethren, the AMA uses a 12AU7 preamp circuit modeled around the Hammond AO-28 design, then adds a pair of 6V6GT tubes running push-pull to drive the output section. The controls are simple and straightforward. As to be expected with Speakeasy, both the preamp and power amp stages are transformer-coupled. |
The front panel provides:
The rear panel provides:
The SVTP is manufactured in the USA.
This approach has been used by guitarists for years, particularly in the studio. Turning up a tube amp allows one to reach its sweet spot, while using a power soak device brings the volume level back to a practical range. This method can be used with higher-power amps, but setting the levels can become trickier. And besides, who wants to lug around a big, heavy amp just to treat it as a preamp?
Other than the convenience of having all the pieces in one place, though, what makes the AMA better than say, getting a 5-10W guitar amp, loading it with a power soak, and sending the output to a power amp? In theory, nothing. In practice, though, the AMA sounds more like a real Leslie amp, to my ears. The classic 40W Leslie amp has a wonderful overdrive characteristic that many describe as "frying eggs." Most tube power amps have similar sonic properties, but the Leslie amp took a different approach than the majority of '40s-'50s musical instrument amps, which were copies of (then current) hi-fi, "ultralinear" designs.
Put simply, the Leslie's amplifier design trades off maximum output power for lower distortion before it clips; i.e., the amp stays clean longer, but once it overloads, it quickly falls into heavy distortion -- but still in that nice "tube" way. Part of the classic Hammond sound is the selective use of this feature, and the exact tone isn't easy to find outside the organ world. (Anyone who is old enough to have swapped the amp on their 122 or 147 for a Fender, Ampeg, Marshall, or Sunn tube amp knows that the resulting Leslie might have been louder, but it wasn't necessarily better.)
The folks at Speakeasy created a 10W design that copied not only the overdrive aspects, but other sonic features of the 40W counterpart. So, while the term "modeling" doesn't apply it's recent, digital definition, I think it applies here in its original sense: "The AMA is modeled after a Leslie 122 amplifier, warts and all. Does it sound "exactly like a Leslie 122" when driven hard? Truthfully, it would probably fail a direct A/B test with the Real Deal on a few small points. But it's far closer than an Epiphone Valve Junior or Blackheart Killer Ant, or even a vintage Fender Champ. Each of those guitar amps weren't designed with the same output stage, and they have different frequency response and input gain to boot.
An interesting point is that the AMA comes so close to the sound of the Real Deal that it needs -- and wants -- nothing added, tonally, to the chain. Prior to owning my AMA, my rig was:
Korg BX-3 -> Speakeasy VTP w/Barker -> Hafler P3000 -> LowBoy From Hell
I started out by simply swapping the AMA for the Speakeasy preamp:
Korg BX-3 -> AMA -> Hafler P3000 -> LBFH
I expected nirvana, but it didn't work out that way. The P3000 added its own tube-like MOSFET warmth -- which was welcome in the previous setup, but not with the AMA. The P3000's tone, added to the AMA's own warmth, sounded muddy in the 200-400Hz range. Reducing the bass on the AMA helped the tone, but killed the "frying eggs" effect. Reducing the low end on the BX-3 thinned the sound.
After a few weeks of playing around with EQ and gain everywhere in the chain to no avail, I swapped in an ART SLA2:
Korg BX-3 -> AMA -> SLA2 -> LBFH
Suddenly, the AMA started to shine, and I could put some of the bass back in my setup. Why? The SLA2 is one of the most 'personality-less' amps I've ever owned -- and I say that in a good way. The sound of the SLA2 with a quality set of speakers is just like a very loud set of headphones. This allowed the AMA to dominate the sound chain. The new setup was a huge improvement in the overall character of the organ sound. Clearly, the AMA doesn't need help in the tone department -- only with the volume!
In another word: Y-freakin'-E-freakin'-S!!!
I can dial in everything from the dark growl of the Allman Brothers, to the hard-workin' push of Kansas and ELP, to the dying scream of Gregg Rolie's "we were broke, and Leslie was broke, too" road warrior on 'Samba Pa Ti' -- all by adjusting the send level of my BX-3. You want early Jon Lord? No problem. Spencer Davis Band? Yep, we got that, too. Green Onions? It's in there.
And the AMA and a good power amp can provide those sounds at volumes ranging from low enough to allow dinner conversation, to levels that cause items to fall from shelves.
No laboratory animals were used during the evaluation of this product!